Assin North: Supreme Court dismisses review application filed by MP

The Supreme Court has dismissed a review application filed by Member of Parliament for Assin North James Gyakye Quayson challenging the apex court’s decision for him to file his response to an interlocutory injunction.

The panel of nine chaired by Justice Jones Victor Dotse in their unanimous ruling said the review application lacks merit and accordingly dismissed it. The decision of the court has paved the way for the hearing of the substantive interlocutory injunction seeking to stop him from performing his parliamentary duties.

Meanwhile, the application for Stay of Proceedings pending the determination of the appeal has been withdrawn by the applicant as Moot and was subsequently struck out.

The full reasoning of the Justices according to Justice Dotse, the president of the panel would be made ready on or before Friday, April 8, 2022.

Lawyers of the MP led by Tsatsu Tsikata had moved a review application after the seven member panel of the apex court had said he was duly notified of the pendency of the case.

On March 16, the hearing of the injunction filed by Michael Ankomah Nimfah, a private citizen against the Assin North MP from performing his parliamentary duties was blocked with two motions – a Review application against the court’s ruling on March 8 and a Stay of Proceedings.

On March 29, while moving the motion for the nine member enhanced panel to review the apex court’s earlier decision, Lawyer for the Applicant Tsatsu Tsikata said, , the Supreme Court not complying with its own orders renders their sitting on March 16, a “nullity and void.”

He argued that, the order of substituted service in the Daily Graphic on March 1, was not in conformity to what the court’s order was.

“My Lords, not only with the non compliance but there was an insertion made which were different in material…against what was ordered by the court,” Mr Tsikata argued.


Frank Davies, counsel for the respondent on his part said, they are of the considered view that no exceptional circumstance has been adduced to show that there was a miscarriage of Justice.

He said, there was nothing wrong with the order of the court and that the applicant has been duly served.

Previous articleVIdeo: Fowl thief asked by Police to demonstrate how he did it
Next articleE-Levy is a credible recovery programme – Akufo-Addo on BBC


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.